A Conflict of Visions
- Michael Connolly
- Oct 15
- 2 min read
Updated: Oct 17
A Conflict of Visions: Ideological Origins of Political Struggles by Thomas Sowell, Basic Books, 2007.
Social Visions
Sowell sees differing political and economic philosophies as originating from differing visions of human nature. Sowell identifies two of these visions: the constrained vision and the unconstrained vision. Constrained by what? Well, constrained by reality and human nature. Sowell favors the constrained vision, and criticizes the unconstrained vision for its wishful thinking, utopianism and denial of human nature. Sowell hopes for more public debate about these differing visions.
William Godwin
William Godwin is Sowell’s main example of the unconstrained vision. Godwin’s work incorporated ideas from Rousseau and Condorcet. Godwin’s main work was: Enquiry Concerning Political Justice (1793). Godwin believed that: (a) The intention to benefit others is the essence of virtue, (b) One should put the interests of others above ones own selfish interests, (c) People should be changed to increase their sense of social duty and generosity.
Comparison of Unconstrained and Constrained Visions
Unconstrained Vision | Constrained Vision |
Utopian | Tragic |
Human nature is malleable and perfectible | Human nature is fundamentally flawed |
Bad institutions are the source of evil | Human nature is the source of evil |
Explicitly articulated rationality | Systemic rationality (history, experience and custom) |
Perfect solutions | Trade-offs (the best is the enemy of the good) |
Good intentions are more important than consequences of actions | The road to hell is paved with good intentions |
Virtue is its own reward | Incentives (rewarding virtue and punishing sin) are necessary |
Elitism | Respect for the judgement of the common man |
The government decides | The individual decides |
Freedom means that each individual should be able to obtain what he needs to live, regardless of his personal abilities | Freedom means being allowed to choose ones actions without being obstructed by government |
Social justice | Property rights |
Entitlements | Charity |
Economic equality | Political equality: equality before the law |
The highest priority of the criminal justice system should be fairness to the criminal | The highest priority of the criminal justice system should be to protect society from the criminal |
Internationalism | Nationalism |
Unconstrained Thinkers
Jean-Jacques Rousseau (mid-18th century Swiss French political philosopher)
Marquis de Condorcet (French political scientists of the late 18th century)
William Godwin (English political philosopher of the late 18th century)
Edward Bellamy (late 19th century American novelist)
John Dewey (early 20th century American Progressive educational reformer)
Thorstein Veblen (early 20th century American sociologist and economist)
George Bernard Shaw (early 20th century Irish playwright and Fabian)
Gunnar Myrdal (Mid-twentieth century Swedish economist and sociologist)
John Rawls (Mid-twentieth century American philosopher)
Constrained Thinkers
Thomas Hobbes (17th century English philosopher)
Adam Smith (18th century Scottish economic philosopher)
Edmund Burke (18th century Irish philosopher and member of the British Parliament)
William Blackstone (18th century English jurist)
The Federalist Papers (Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, John Jay)
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. (U.S. Supreme Court justice)
Austrian School of Economics (Carl Menger)
Friedrich A. Hayek (twentieth century Austrian economist)
Comments